On 28/05/2025 14:54, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> .pmxops = &rzn1_pmx_ops, >> .confops = &rzn1_pinconf_ops, >> .owner = THIS_MODULE, >> + .pins = rzn1_pins, >> + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(rzn1_pins), >> }; >> >> static int rzn1_pinctrl_parse_groups(struct device_node *np, >> @@ -878,8 +880,6 @@ static int rzn1_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> ipctl->dev = &pdev->dev; >> rzn1_pinctrl_desc.name = dev_name(&pdev->dev); > > ... if you would replace this assignment by a hardcoded name > like "pinctrl-rzn1". I saw it, but this would not be equivalent. dev_name includes platform bus id, e.g. pinctrl-rzn1.0 which might matter here - conflict of names. Are you sure this would work fine? Best regards, Krzysztof
