> -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2025年8月18日 23:49 > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx; > l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx; kwilczynski@xxxxxxxxxx; > mani@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; > shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > festevam@xxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if > QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM is existing in suspend > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote: > > Refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.2, fig 5-1 Link Power Management State Flow > > Diagram. Both L0 and L2/L3 Ready can be transferred to LDn directly. > > > > It's harmless to let dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() proceed suspend after the > > PME_Turn_Off is sent out, whatever the LTSSM state is in L2 or L3 > > after a recommended 10ms max wait refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.3.3.2.1 > > PME Synchronization. > > > > The LTSSM states are inaccessible on i.MX6QP and i.MX7D after the > > PME_Turn_Off is sent out. > > > > To support this case, don't poll L2 state and apply a simple delay of > > PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US(10ms) if the QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM flag > is > > set in suspend. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 31 > > +++++++++++++------ drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | > > 4 +++ > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > > index 952f8594b5012..20a7f827babbf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c > > @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > { > > u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); > > u32 val; > > - int ret; > > + int ret = 0; > > > > /* > > * If L1SS is supported, then do not put the link into L2 as > > some > * devices such as NVMe expect low resume latency. > */ > if (dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) & > PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1) > return 0; > > You didn't change it in this patch (the L1SS test was added by > 4774faf854f5 ("PCI: dwc: Implement generic suspend/resume functionality")), > but this L1SS check is an encapsulation problem. > The ASPM configuration shouldn't leak out here in such an ad hoc way. Hi Bjorn: Thanks for your comments. Should I created another commit to get ride of the L1SS check codes? > > *All* drivers, not just NVMe, would prefer low resume latency. > > How do we deal with this in other host controller drivers? If any other > driver puts links in L2, I suppose they would have the same issue? Maybe > DWC is the only one that puts the link in L2? > > What happens when we add a new driver that puts links in L2? I guess > we'll be debugging some NVMe issue again? Up to now, this is the first one routine to do the L1SS check in L2 entry. Best Regards Richard Zhu > > Bjorn