On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:57:59AM -0400, Donald Dutile wrote: > ... and why was the above code done in patch 3 and then undone here to > use the reachable() support in patch 5 below, when patch 5 could be moved before > patch 3, and we just get to this final implementation, dropping (some of) patch 3? If you use that order then the switch stuff has to be done and redone :( I put it in this order because the switch change seems lower risk to me. Fewer people have switches in their system. While the MFD change on top is higher risk, even my simple consumer test systems hit troubles with it. Jason
