On Tue, 05 Aug 2025 14:59:27 +0100, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 02:20:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Aug 2025 14:09:34 +0100, > > Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> [ Upstream commit 3cc8f625e4c6a0e9f936da6b94166e62e387fe1d ] > >> > >> Since changing the affinity of an MSI really is about changing > >> the target address and that it isn't possible to mask an individual > >> MSI, it is completely possible for an interrupt to race with itself, > >> usually resulting in a lost interrupt. > >> > >> Paper over the design blunder by informing the core code of this > >> sad state of affairs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250708173404.1278635-11-maz@xxxxxxxxxx > >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> LLM Generated explanations, may be completely bogus: > > > > s/may be//. It is an amusing read though, specially when quoting > > totally unrelated patches, so thumbs up for the comical value. > > Yeah, it's still very much at the "junior engineer" level It's not, and that's the main issue. A junior engineer would get into the rabbit hole of backporting too much, as they would be unable to separate the essential logic from the surrounding fluff. There would be a lot of noise, but it would be OK. Your "thing" is very much at the "Senior Marketroid" level, in the sense that it manages to drag some semi-relevant information from various sources, and condenses it into an advertisement for snake oil. I think I know who which of the two I want to work with. M. -- Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.
