Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] rust: irq: add support for non-threaded IRQs and handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun Jul 13, 2025 at 4:48 PM CEST, Daniel Almeida wrote:
>
>
>> On 13 Jul 2025, at 11:27, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun Jul 13, 2025 at 4:19 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> On Sun Jul 13, 2025 at 4:09 PM CEST, Daniel Almeida wrote:
>>>> On a second look, I wonder how useful this will be.
>>>> 
>>>> fn handle(&self, dev: &Device<Bound>) -> IrqReturn
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry for borrowing this terminology, but here we offer Device<Bound>, while I
>>>> suspect that most drivers will be looking for the most derived Device type
>>>> instead. So for drm drivers this will be drm::Device, for example, not the base
>>>> dev::Device type. I assume that this pattern will hold for other subsystems as
>>>> well.
>>>> 
>>>> Which brings me to my second point: drivers can store an ARef<drm::Device> on
>>>> the handler itself, and I assume that the same will be possible in other
>>>> subsystems.
>>> 
>>> Well, the whole point is that you can use a &Device<Bound> to directly access
>>> device resources without any overhead, i.e.
>>> 
>>> fn handle(&self, dev: &Device<Bound>) -> IrqReturn {
>>>   let io = self.iomem.access(dev);
>>> 
>>>   io.write32(...);
>>> }
>> 
>> So, yes, you can store anything in your handler, but the &Device<Bound> is a
>> cookie for the scope.
>
> Fine, but can’t you get a &Device<Bound> from a ARef<drm::Device>, for example?
> Perhaps a nicer solution would be to offer this capability instead?

I think you're confusing quite some things here.

  (1) I'm talking about the bus device the IRQ is registered for (e.g. PCI,
      platform, etc.). drm::Device represents a class device, which do not
      have DeviceContext states, such as Bound.

  (2) Owning a reference count of a device (i.e. ARef<Device>) does *not*
      guarantee that the device is bound. You can own a reference count to the
      device object way beyond it being bound. Instead, the guarantee comes from
      the scope.

      In this case, the scope is the IRQ callback, since the irq::Registration
      guarantees to call and complete free_irq() before the underlying bus
      device is unbound.





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux