On a second look, I wonder how useful this will be. fn handle(&self, dev: &Device<Bound>) -> IrqReturn Sorry for borrowing this terminology, but here we offer Device<Bound>, while I suspect that most drivers will be looking for the most derived Device type instead. So for drm drivers this will be drm::Device, for example, not the base dev::Device type. I assume that this pattern will hold for other subsystems as well. Which brings me to my second point: drivers can store an ARef<drm::Device> on the handler itself, and I assume that the same will be possible in other subsystems. -- Daniel
