On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 08:41:59AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 00:15:19 +0200 > Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 6/23/25 8:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > >> Enable support for device ID structures that do not contain > >> context/data field (usually named `driver_data`), making the trait > >> usable in a wider range of subsystems and buses. > >> Several such structures are defined in > >> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h. > >> This refactoring is a preparation for enabling the PHY abstractions to > >> use device_id trait. > >> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks a lot! > > Miguel suggested that splitting the RawDeviceId trait might lead to a > cleaner design, and I also tried that approach [v2]. But just to > confirm ― do you prefer the original v1 approach instead? Sorry, I didn't catch v2.
