RE: [PATCH 03/10] PCI: exynos: Reorder MACROs to maintain consistency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 21 May 2025 15:16
> To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx; lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx;
> kw@xxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx; kishon@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx; Hrishikesh Dileep <hrishikesh.d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] PCI: exynos: Reorder MACROs to maintain consistency
> 
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 01:01:45AM GMT, Shradha Todi wrote:
> > Exynos PCI file follows MACRO definition order where register offset
> > is defined in ascending order and each bit field within the offset is
> > defined right after offset definition. Some MACROs are out of order
> > and so reorder those MACROs to maintain consistency.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Hrishikesh Dileep <hrishikesh.d@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c
> > index 990aaa16b132..286f4987d56f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-exynos.c
> > @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@
> >
> >  /* PCIe ELBI registers */
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_IRQ_PULSE			0x000
> > +#define EXYNOS_PCIE_IRQ_EN_PULSE		0x00c
> >  #define EXYNOS_IRQ_INTA_ASSERT			BIT(0)
> >  #define EXYNOS_IRQ_INTB_ASSERT			BIT(2)
> >  #define EXYNOS_IRQ_INTC_ASSERT			BIT(4)
> >  #define EXYNOS_IRQ_INTD_ASSERT			BIT(6)
> > -#define EXYNOS_PCIE_IRQ_EN_PULSE		0x00c
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_IRQ_EN_LEVEL		0x010
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_IRQ_EN_SPECIAL		0x014
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_SW_WAKE			0x018
> > @@ -42,12 +42,12 @@
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_NONSTICKY_RESET		0x024
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_APP_INIT_RESET		0x028
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE		0x02c
> > +#define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_LTSSM_ENABLE		0x1
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_RDLH_LINKUP		0x074
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_XMLH_LINKUP		BIT(4)
> > -#define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_LTSSM_ENABLE		0x1
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_SLV_AWMISC		0x11c
> >  #define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_SLV_ARMISC		0x120
> > -#define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_SLV_DBI_ENABLE	BIT(21)
> > +#define EXYNOS_PCIE_ELBI_SLV_DBI_ENABLE		BIT(21)
> 
> What changed here? Why you cannot fix indentation while renaming?
> 

Will squash the indentation change along with rename

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof






[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux