On 25/04/2025 17:33, Hans Zhang wrote: > > > On 2025/4/25 22:48, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 02:19:11AM +0000, Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:04:41AM +0800,hans.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>>> From: Manikandan K Pillai<mpillai@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Document the compatible property for HPA (High Performance >>>> Architecture) >>>>>> PCIe controller EP configuration. >>>>> Please explain what makes the new architecture sufficiently different >>>>> from the existing one such that a fallback compatible does not work. >>>>> >>>>> Same applies to the other binding patch. >>>> Additionally, since this IP is likely in use on your sky1 SoC, why is a >>>> soc-specific compatible for your integration not needed? >>>> >>> The sky1 SoC support patches will be developed and submitted by the Sky1 >>> team separately. >> Why? Cixtech sent this patchset, they should send it with their user. > > Hi Conor, > > Please look at the communication history of this website. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/CH2PPF4D26F8E1C1CBD2A866C59AA55CD7AA2A12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ And in that thread I asked for Soc specific compatible. More than once. Conor asks again. I don't understand your answers at all. Best regards, Krzysztof
