On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 02:19:11AM +0000, Manikandan Karunakaran Pillai wrote: > > > > > >On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:04:41AM +0800, hans.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > From: Manikandan K Pillai <mpillai@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > Document the compatible property for HPA (High Performance > >Architecture) > >> > PCIe controller EP configuration. > >> > >> Please explain what makes the new architecture sufficiently different > >> from the existing one such that a fallback compatible does not work. > >> > >> Same applies to the other binding patch. > > > >Additionally, since this IP is likely in use on your sky1 SoC, why is a > >soc-specific compatible for your integration not needed? > > > > The sky1 SoC support patches will be developed and submitted by the Sky1 > team separately. Why? Cixtech sent this patchset, they should send it with their user.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
