On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:44:35AM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote: > On Sun Apr 13, 2025 at 7:37 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > + $device, > > + $crate::device::Bound => $crate::device::Normal > > IIUC, all "devices" (so eg `pci::Device`) will use this macro, right? In > that case, I think we can document this behavior a bit better, possibly > on the `DeviceContext` context trait and/or on the different type > states. So on `Core` we could say "The `Core` context is a supercontext > of the [`Bound`] context and devices also expose operations available in > that context while in `Core`." and similarly on `Bound` with `Normal`. Fully agree, I absolutely want to have this documented. I wasn't yet sure where I want to document this though. device::DeviceContext seems to be a reasonable place. Besides that, I think I also want to rename it to device::Context, not sure if it's worth though. I will send a subsequent patch for the documentation on DeviceContext.
