On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:57:35 +0100, Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:17:01AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > From: Janne Grunau <j@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Iterating over disabled ports results in of_irq_parse_raw() parsing > > the wrong "interrupt-map" entries, as it takes the status of the node > > 'as it doesn't take account'? > > > into account. No, I really mean it in the positive form. of_irq_parse_raw() checks of_device_is_available(), and gets really confused if walking from a disabled port. You end up with the interrupt for the next *available* port, and everything goes pear shaped from then onwards. So IMO "as it takes into account" describes pretty accurately the situation. M. -- Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.
