From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 06:50:21 +0200 > On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:52:47PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:09:49 +0200 > > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:03:06PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > > > I actually tried to to do so as sock_create_user() in the > > > > previous series but was advised to avoid rename as the benefit > > > > against LoC was low. > > > > > > I can't really parse this. What is the 'benefit against LoC'? > > > > It was a kind of subjective opinion whether the amount of changes > > was worth or not. > > So the simple scripted renaming was not worth it. Maybe I misunderstand, > but based on the reading we should basically have about a handful > callers of the non-__kern variant left. Or is it a lot more? Yes, after this series, only 2 sock_create() left, one in sctp and another in core.
