Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] socket: Replace most sock_create() calls with sock_create_kern().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:52:47PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:09:49 +0200
> > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:03:06PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > > I actually tried to to do so as sock_create_user() in the
> > > previous series but was advised to avoid rename as the benefit
> > > against LoC was low.
> > 
> > I can't really parse this.  What is the 'benefit against LoC'?
> 
> It was a kind of subjective opinion whether the amount of changes
> was worth or not.

So the simple scripted renaming was not worth it.  Maybe I misunderstand,
but based on the reading we should basically have about a handful
callers of the non-__kern variant left.  Or is it a lot more?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux