Applied to pcmcia-next. Thanks, Dominik Am Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:04:37AM +0700 schrieb Bagas Sanjaya: > pcmcia_dev_present() comment writes about small timeframe where > the function returns NULL (racy condition), in epizeuxis device. In the > past, it tripped contributors who misunderstood it for "really" > duplicate ([1], [2]). > > Add comma between "really" words to emphasize the epizeuxis. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YxT1As38WRZcyH0%2F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [1] > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220831083623.GA25639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2] > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pcmcia/ds.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c > index da6f66f357cc10..18f4eef28dbc5d 100644 > --- a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c > +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c > @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static int pcmcia_bus_early_resume(struct pcmcia_socket *skt) > * physically present, even if the call to this function returns > * non-NULL. Furthermore, the device driver most likely is unbound > * almost immediately, so the timeframe where pcmcia_dev_present > - * returns NULL is probably really really small. > + * returns NULL is probably really, really small. > */ > struct pcmcia_device *pcmcia_dev_present(struct pcmcia_device *_p_dev) > { > > base-commit: 8f5ae30d69d7543eee0d70083daf4de8fe15d585 > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara > >
