Re: [cocci] [RFC] Choosing “semantics” better for SmPL script parts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The default is exists for use with * and forall with transformation, with
> the reasoning for the latter being that when transformation occurs the
> trasformed code should be consistent.

Will corresponding development concerns be reconsidered in more detail?

Would you understand the source code search parameter “forall” in the way
that it expresses a stronger data processing requirement (than the setting
alternative “exists”)?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification

Is it known if such a quantification difference would influence software
run time characteristics in significant ways?

Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux