[RFC] Choosing “semantics” better for SmPL script parts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

A bit of information is provided about special “semantics” (also in the manual
for the semantic patch language).
https://gitlab.inria.fr/coccinelle/coccinelle/-/blob/face14907c0791b93397d5788d2a94c7c6a4b886/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L1007-1014

Usage possibilities are indicated for the key words “exists” and “forall”.

* Would any more software users like to discuss and clarify safer applications
  of these system configuration parameters?

* Would you be looking for better “connections” according to computation tree
  logic (or linear temporal logic) variations?


Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux