Re: [PATCH] can: ucan: Use usb_endpoint_type() rather than duplicating its implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> it seems that Coccinelle missed many simplifications.
>> Would such software transformations become better supported anyhow?
> Maybe?
> 
> I am not involved in the development of Coccinelle and thus, I don't have an answer.

This can be fine (in principle).


> Nor do I have the time to read and understand the Coccinelle source code
> to which you pointed me to.

I hope that more users can become interested in presented information.
I would appreciate if knowledge representations can be improved also for
better automatic data processing and corresponding transformations.


> My stance is that such static analyzers should never be trusted 100%.

This is generally fine.


> The output is more an indicator.

This is usual.


>                       And in this present case, a quick review made it very
> clear that Coccinelle saw one simplification but missed two other ones.

Would you find another source code adjustment (like the following) more appropriate?


diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
index 07406daf7c88..6c6cee3895c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
@@ -1352,17 +1352,12 @@ static int ucan_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 	for (i = 0; i < iface_desc->desc.bNumEndpoints; i++) {
 		ep = &iface_desc->endpoint[i].desc;
 
-		if (((ep->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) != 0) &&
-		    ((ep->bmAttributes & USB_ENDPOINT_XFERTYPE_MASK) ==
-		     USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK)) {
+		if (usb_endpoint_dir_in(ep) && usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(ep)) {
 			/* In Endpoint */
 			in_ep_addr = ep->bEndpointAddress;
 			in_ep_addr &= USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK;
 			in_ep_size = le16_to_cpu(ep->wMaxPacketSize);
-		} else if (((ep->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) ==
-			    0) &&
-			   ((ep->bmAttributes & USB_ENDPOINT_XFERTYPE_MASK) ==
-			    USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK)) {
+		} else if (usb_endpoint_dir_out(ep) && usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(ep)) {
 			/* Out Endpoint */
 			out_ep_addr = ep->bEndpointAddress;
 			out_ep_addr &= USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK;


Can the functions “usb_endpoint_is_bulk_in” and “usb_endpoint_is_bulk_out”
be applied here?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc3/source/include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h#L572-L595

Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux