On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:35:04 +0200 Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Applied to the vfs-6.18.iomap branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. > >>> Patches in the vfs-6.18.iomap branch should appear in linux-next soon. > >> > >> Hmm, AFAIK largest_zero_folio just showed up in mm.git a few days ago. > >> Wouldn't it be better to queue up this change there? > >> > >> > > > > Indeed, compiling vfs/vfs.all as of today fails with: > > > > fs/iomap/direct-io.c:281:36: error: implicit declaration of function > > ‘largest_zero_folio’; did you mean ‘is_zero_folio’? [-Wimplicit- > > function-declaration] > > > > Reverting "iomap: use largest_zero_folio() in iomap_dio_zero()" fixes > > the compilation. > > > > I also got some reports from Stephen in linux-next. As Christoph > suggested, maybe we drop the patches from Christian's tree and queue it > up via Andrew's tree Thanks, I added it to mm.git.
