On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 08:59:41AM -0700, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-08-18 at 15:51 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 07:39:49AM -0700, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > +void folio_end_dropbehind(struct folio *folio)
> > > +{
> > > + filemap_end_dropbehind_write(folio);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_end_dropbehind);
> >
> > Why not just export filemap_end_dropbehind_write()?
>
> It seemed more appropriate to use the 'folio' prefix when exporting, so
> that it is symmetric with folio_end_writeback().
>
> I'm perfectly fine with changing that if people disagree.
I don't mind renaming filemap_end_dropbehind_write() to
folio_end_dropbehind() as a solution!
