On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 7:44 AM Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In case of FUSE_NOTIFY_RESEND and FUSE_NOTIFY_INC_EPOCH fuse_copy_finish()
> isn't called.
>
> Fix by always calling fuse_copy_finish() after fuse_notify(). It's a no-op
> if called a second time.
>
> Fixes: 760eac73f9f6 ("fuse: Introduce a new notification type for resend pending requests")
> Fixes: 2396356a945b ("fuse: add more control over cache invalidation behaviour")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v6.9
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> index df793003eb0c..85d05a5e40e9 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> @@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_do_write(struct fuse_dev *fud,
> */
> if (!oh.unique) {
> err = fuse_notify(fc, oh.error, nbytes - sizeof(oh), cs);
> - goto out;
> + goto copy_finish;
> }
>
> err = -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
