On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 9:19 AM NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 2:47 AM NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > More excellent review feedback - more patches :-)
> > > >
> > > > I've chosen to use ovl_parent_lock() here as a temporary and leave the
> > > > debate over naming for the VFS version of the function until all the new
> > > > names are introduced later.
> > >
> > > Perfect.
> > >
> > > Please push v3 patches to branch pdirops, or to a clean branch
> > > based on vfs-6.17.file, so I can test them.
> >
> > There is a branch "ovl" which is based on vfs.all as I depend on a
> > couple of other vfs changes.
>
> ok I will test this one.
>
> Do you mean that ovl branch depends on other vfs changes or that pdirops
> which is based on ovl branch depends on other vfs changes?
ovl branch depends on
Commit bc9241367aac ("VFS: change old_dir and new_dir in struct renamedata to dentrys")
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Just asking because I did not notice any other dependencies in ovl branch,
> so wanted to know which are they.
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
