Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] ovl: narrow regions protected by i_rw_sem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 9:19 AM NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 2:47 AM NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > More excellent review feedback - more patches :-)
> > >
> > > I've chosen to use ovl_parent_lock() here as a temporary and leave the
> > > debate over naming for the VFS version of the function until all the new
> > > names are introduced later.
> >
> > Perfect.
> >
> > Please push v3 patches to branch pdirops, or to a clean branch
> > based on vfs-6.17.file, so I can test them.
>
> There is a branch "ovl" which is based on vfs.all as I depend on a
> couple of other vfs changes.

ok I will test this one.

Do you mean that ovl branch depends on other vfs changes or that pdirops
which is based on ovl branch depends on other vfs changes?

Just asking because I did not notice any other dependencies in ovl branch,
so wanted to know which are they.

Thanks,
Amir.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux