Re: Do we need an opt-in for file systems use of hw atomic writes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph,

> I don't know. But cheap consumer SSDs can basically exhibit any
> brokenness you can imagine. And claiming to support atomics basically
> just means filling out a single field in identify with a non-zero
> value. So my hopes of only seeing it in a few devices is low, moreover
> we will only notice it was broken when people lost data.

It's very unfortunate that AWUN/AWUPF are useless. Even when it comes to
something as simple as sanity checking the reported NAWUN/NAWUPF.

For PCIe transport devices maybe we could consider adding an additional
heuristic based on something like PLP or VWC?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux