Re: Do we need an opt-in for file systems use of hw atomic writes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > Is is just me, or would it be a good idea to require an explicit
> > opt-in to user hardware atomics?
> 
> How common do we think broken atomics implementations; is this
> something that we could solve using a blacklist of broken devices?

I don't know.  But cheap consumer SSDs can basically exhibit any
brokenness you can imagine.  And claiming to support atomics basically
just means filling out a single field in identify with a non-zero
value.  So my hopes of only seeing it in a few devices is low,
moreover we will only notice it was broken when people lost data.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux