Re: [PATCH] selinuxfs_fill_super(): don't bother with selinuxfs_info_free() on failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:44:23PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 10:02 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > [don't really care which tree that goes through; right now it's
> > in viro/vfs.git #work.misc, but if somebody prefers to grab it
> > through a different tree, just say so]
> >
> > Failures in there will be followed by sel_kill_sb(), which will call
> > selinuxfs_info_free() anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  security/selinux/selinuxfs.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks Al.  I went ahead and merged this into the selinux/dev branch
> to help avoid any merge issues, but if you've changed your mind and
> feel strongly about taking it via your tree let me know.

Dropped from #work.misc and #for-next




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux