Re: [PATCH] selinuxfs_fill_super(): don't bother with selinuxfs_info_free() on failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 10:02 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [don't really care which tree that goes through; right now it's
> in viro/vfs.git #work.misc, but if somebody prefers to grab it
> through a different tree, just say so]
>
> Failures in there will be followed by sel_kill_sb(), which will call
> selinuxfs_info_free() anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  security/selinux/selinuxfs.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

Thanks Al.  I went ahead and merged this into the selinux/dev branch
to help avoid any merge issues, but if you've changed your mind and
feel strongly about taking it via your tree let me know.

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux