On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 12:42 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:17:14PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote: > > > Sure. What I mean is that I want to do this last before getting the > > > series ready to merge. I.e. don't bother with until we have something > > > we're all fine with on a conceptual level. > > > > I'm pausing this patchset until yours lands and then I was planning to > > rebase this (the CONFIG_BLOCK and fuse specifics) on top of yours. Not > > sure if that's what you mean or not, but yes, happy to go with > > whatever you think works best. > > It's not going to land without a user.. > > At some point we'll need to fuse side of this to go ahead. I'm happy > to either hand control of the series to you, or work with you on a > common tree to make that happen. I will send v3 today with: Patches 1 to 11: the patches in your patchset in [1] Patches 12 to 15: the fuse patches in this patchset (14/16, 15/16, and 16/16) and temporarily drop the CONFIG_BLOCK patches until the series is ready to merge. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250617105514.3393938-1-hch@xxxxxx/
