On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 9:45 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:20:38AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote: > > > Ah, ok. Are you fine with getting something that works for fuse first, > > > and then we look into !CONFIG_BLOCK environments as a next step? > > > > I think the fuse iomap work has a hard dependency on the CONFIG_BLOCK > > work else it would break backwards compatibility for fuse (eg > > non-CONFIG_BLOCK environments wouldn't be able to compile/use fuse > > anymore) > > Sure. What I mean is that I want to do this last before getting the > series ready to merge. I.e. don't bother with until we have something > we're all fine with on a conceptual level. I'm pausing this patchset until yours lands and then I was planning to rebase this (the CONFIG_BLOCK and fuse specifics) on top of yours. Not sure if that's what you mean or not, but yes, happy to go with whatever you think works best.
