Hi Christian,
Could you please pick up the patch?
Thanks,
Slava.
On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 18:28 +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 08:00 -0600, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > Since 5.10, splice() or sendfile() return EINVAL. This was
> > caused by commit 36e2c7421f02 ("fs: don't allow splice read/write
> > without explicit ops").
> >
> > This patch initializes the splice_write field in file_operations,
> > like
> > most file systems do, to restore the functionality.
> >
> > Fixes: 36e2c7421f02 ("fs: don't allow splice read/write without
> > explicit ops")
> > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/hfs/inode.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/hfs/inode.c b/fs/hfs/inode.c
> > index a81ce7a740b9..451115360f73 100644
> > --- a/fs/hfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/hfs/inode.c
> > @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static const struct file_operations
> > hfs_file_operations = {
> > .write_iter = generic_file_write_iter,
> > .mmap = generic_file_mmap,
> > .splice_read = filemap_splice_read,
> > + .splice_write = iter_file_splice_write,
> > .fsync = hfs_file_fsync,
> > .open = hfs_file_open,
> > .release = hfs_file_release,
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Slava.
