On 5/14/25 10:56, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> Fixes: c84bf6dd2b83 ("mm: introduce new .mmap_prepare() file callback")
Ah yeah I missed there wasn't one.
> Is it worth having a fixes tag for something not upstream? This is why I
> excluded that. I feel like it's maybe more misleading when the commit hashes are
> ephemeral in a certain branch?
Yeah it can be useful, in case the fixed commit gets backported somewhere,
tools can warn that there's a follow up fix. As mm-stable hashes should not
be ephemeral, then this should remain valid (and if there's a rebase for
some reason then the fix could be squashed).
>>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David / dhildenb
>>
