Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: perform VMA allocation, freeing, duplication in mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/28/25 17:28, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Right now these are performed in kernel/fork.c which is odd and a violation
> of separation of concerns, as well as preventing us from integrating this
> and related logic into userland VMA testing going forward, and perhaps more
> importantly - enabling us to, in a subsequent commit, make VMA
> allocation/freeing a purely internal mm operation.

I wonder if the last part is from an earlier version and now obsolete
because there's not subsequent commit in this series and the placement of
alloc/freeing in vma_init.c seems making those purely internal mm operations
already? Or do you mean some further plans?

> There is a fly in the ointment - nommu - mmap.c is not compiled if
> CONFIG_MMU not set, and neither is vma.c.
> 
> To square the circle, let's add a new file - vma_init.c. This will be
> compiled for both CONFIG_MMU and nommu builds, and will also form part of
> the VMA userland testing.
> 
> This allows us to de-duplicate code, while maintaining separation of
> concerns and the ability for us to userland test this logic.
> 
> Update the VMA userland tests accordingly, additionally adding a
> detach_free_vma() helper function to correctly detach VMAs before freeing
> them in test code, as this change was triggering the assert for this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux