Hi All, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Joel, > > "Joel Becker" <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:42:29AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:47:23PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: >>> > > There's no need to get upset. Several people pointed out that Joel >>> > > Becker retired and since he hasn't responded this felt like the right >>> > > thing to do. Just send a patch to add him back. I see no reason to not >>> > > have Andreas step up to maintain it. >>> > >>> > Removing someone just because they have retired feels odd, but hey who >>> > am I to complain. I did reach out to him when giving maintainership >>> > and he replied although it did indeed take a while. >>> >>> I mean, we can surely put Joel back in. My take would be to remove >>> that person from the maintainer entry because people will get confused >>> when they don't receive a reply. But I'm totally fine if we should leave >>> Joel in. >> >> Howdy folks, >> >> I do apologize for my delayed responses. I try to review patches as I >> find them, but I haven't yet set up a dedicated tree -- a bit out of >> practice. > > How would you like the maintainer entry to look: > > - Are you OK with me taking up maintenance of configfs? > - If yes, > - would you like to be added as a reviewer? > - would you prefer to be listed as co-maintainer? > - If no, > - would you have me as a co-maintainer? > - or would you have me as a reviewer? > > I set up a tree according to the patch I submitted. I did not switch out > linux-next yet, but I was about to send a request to do that. I will > stall that pending your response on the above. Since I got no response on the above, I am going to continue setting up. Best regards, Andreas Hindborg
