On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:42:29AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:47:23PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > There's no need to get upset. Several people pointed out that Joel > > > Becker retired and since he hasn't responded this felt like the right > > > thing to do. Just send a patch to add him back. I see no reason to not > > > have Andreas step up to maintain it. > > > > Removing someone just because they have retired feels odd, but hey who > > am I to complain. I did reach out to him when giving maintainership > > and he replied although it did indeed take a while. > > I mean, we can surely put Joel back in. My take would be to remove > that person from the maintainer entry because people will get confused > when they don't receive a reply. But I'm totally fine if we should leave > Joel in. Howdy folks, I do apologize for my delayed responses. I try to review patches as I find them, but I haven't yet set up a dedicated tree -- a bit out of practice. The Rust patches gave me pause. I have no context to review them -- even the little Rust I am familiar with looks nothing like the complex stuff the kernel bindings are doing. For that part, all I can do is hope someone other than I knows what the Rust should be doing. Thanks, Joel -- "What no boss of a programmer can ever understand is that a programmer is working when he's staring out of the window" - With apologies to Burton Rascoe http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
