Re: [PATCH] netfs: Let netfs depends on PROC_FS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Let netfs depends on PROC_FS
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 16:03:45 +0100
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, Paulo Alcantara <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, netfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1478622.1744097510@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It should marked be module_init(), not fs_initcall().

Actually, it does need to use fs_initcall() so that when it's built in, it
gets initialised before any filesystems that use module_init().

David

References:
- Re: [PATCH] netfs: Let netfs depends on PROC_FS
  - From: David Howells
- Re: [PATCH] netfs: Let netfs depends on PROC_FS
  - From: Paulo Alcantara
- [PATCH] netfs: Let netfs depends on PROC_FS
  - From: Song Liu

Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/3] ovl: Make ovl_cache_entry_find support casefold
Next by Date: [PATCH 2/3] ovl: Make ovl_dentry_weird() accept casefold dentries
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Let netfs depends on PROC_FS
Next by thread: Weird loop device behavior in 6.15-rc1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux