Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:48:10 +0100
Cc: brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, cem@xxxxxxxxxx, dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250313171310.1886394-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
References: <20250313171310.1886394-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

As said before what I'd really like to see going along with this is
a good set of test for xfstests, including exercising the worst case
of the atomic always COW writes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
  - From: John Garry

References:
- [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
  - From: John Garry

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] xfs: update atomic write max size
Next by Date: [PATCH xfsprogs] xfs_io: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux