Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mke2fs.c: fail on multiple '-E' options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mke2fs.c: fail on multiple '-E' options
From: Ralph Siemsen <ralph.siemsen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 20:49:37 -0400
Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <17EED9B4-41D4-4D1C-9838-1ECF5B39C00D@dilger.ca>
References: <20250909-mke2fs-small-fixes-v1-2-c6ba28528af2@linaro.org> <17EED9B4-41D4-4D1C-9838-1ECF5B39C00D@dilger.ca>

Hi Andreas,

On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:32 PM Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think it would be much better to allow and merge multiple "-E" options.

Agreed. I'll work on it and post a v2 patch.

Thanks for your feedback,
Ralph

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mke2fs.c: fail on multiple '-E' options
  - From: Theodore Ts'o

References:
- [PATCH RFC 2/3] mke2fs.c: fail on multiple '-E' options
  - From: Ralph Siemsen
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mke2fs.c: fail on multiple '-E' options
  - From: Andreas Dilger

Prev by Date: [PATCH v3] ext4: increase i_disksize to offset + len in ext4_update_disksize_before_punch()
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [ext4?] possible deadlock in ext4_writepages (2)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mke2fs.c: fail on multiple '-E' options
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mke2fs.c: fail on multiple '-E' options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux