Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: replace strcpy() with '.' assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 01:31:00PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> 
> The compiler (or headers files) can also allow strcpy() of constant
> length strings into arrays (known size). Erroring requests that are too long.
> The strcpy() is then converted to a memcpy() which can then be optimised
> into writes of constants.
> 
> So using strcpy() under those conditions 'isn't all bad' and can generate
> better (and less bug prone) code than trying to hand-optimise it.
> 
> So even through strcpy() is usually a bad idea, there is not need to
> remove the calls that the compiler can validate as safe.

I assume that what the hardening folks want to do is to assert that
strcpy is always evil(tm) so they can detect potential security bugs
by doing "git grep strcpy".

						- Ted




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux