Hi Stephen, Thanks for the review. The kernel patch is in: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250818175258.275997-1-mrghosh@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u I have created a new patch review request for iproute2-next. Updated, the etc/iproute2/rt_protos based on your review comments: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250818193756.277327-1-mrghosh@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u Thanks, Mrinmoy -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2025 12:21 PM To: Mrinmoy Ghosh (mrghosh) <mrghosh@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mrinmoy_g@xxxxxxxxxxx; Mike Mallin (mmallin) <mmallin@xxxxxxxxx>; Patrice Brissette (pbrisset) <pbrisset@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] bridge:fdb: Protocol field in bridge fdb On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 03:11:45 +0000 Mrinmoy Ghosh <mrghosh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h > b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h index 085bb139..1ff9dbee 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h > @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ enum { > #define RTPROT_OSPF 188 /* OSPF Routes */ > #define RTPROT_RIP 189 /* RIP Routes */ > #define RTPROT_EIGRP 192 /* EIGRP Routes */ > +#define RTPROT_HW 193 /* HW Generated Routes */ > > /* rtm_scope > > diff --git a/lib/rt_names.c b/lib/rt_names.c index 7dc194b1..b9bc1b50 > 100644 > --- a/lib/rt_names.c > +++ b/lib/rt_names.c > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static char *rtnl_rtprot_tab[256] = { > [RTPROT_OSPF] = "ospf", > [RTPROT_RIP] = "rip", > [RTPROT_EIGRP] = "eigrp", > + [RTPROT_HW] = "hw", > }; > > struct tabhash { This is iproute2-next material. Where is the kernel patch for this? Iproute headers are synced from kernel headers. If you add new RTPROT entry also need new line into etc/iproute2/rt_protos
