On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 03:11:45 +0000
Mrinmoy Ghosh <mrghosh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> index 085bb139..1ff9dbee 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ enum {
> #define RTPROT_OSPF 188 /* OSPF Routes */
> #define RTPROT_RIP 189 /* RIP Routes */
> #define RTPROT_EIGRP 192 /* EIGRP Routes */
> +#define RTPROT_HW 193 /* HW Generated Routes */
>
> /* rtm_scope
>
> diff --git a/lib/rt_names.c b/lib/rt_names.c
> index 7dc194b1..b9bc1b50 100644
> --- a/lib/rt_names.c
> +++ b/lib/rt_names.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static char *rtnl_rtprot_tab[256] = {
> [RTPROT_OSPF] = "ospf",
> [RTPROT_RIP] = "rip",
> [RTPROT_EIGRP] = "eigrp",
> + [RTPROT_HW] = "hw",
> };
>
> struct tabhash {
This is iproute2-next material.
Where is the kernel patch for this?
Iproute headers are synced from kernel headers.
If you add new RTPROT entry also need new line into etc/iproute2/rt_protos
