On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 04:18:30PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:58:58AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 06:48:41PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote: > > > > Yeah sorry Jon on latter bit, I did mean to get to that but workload > > > > been... well you can see on lore :P > > > > > > > > I have a real backlog even more than usual right now too due to daring to take a > > > > day off on a national holiday here in the UK :)) > > > > > > > > Harry - more than happy for you to do the above as part of this series or > > > > separately, will sling you some tags accordingly. > > > > > > Okay, I'll do as a part of the series (process_addrs.rst and memory-model.rst). > > > > Can you please though make sure the formatting is all good? That doc really > > needs the function names to stand out, so that's key. > > > > I _think_ Jon fixed it so that should work fine but do check first! > > vma_start_write() works well, but it doens't process > anon_vma_[try]lock_read() properly. (only characters after [try] stand out) Hm strange, maybe keep what exists for now. Jon - any thoughts? I can't remember what we decided for getting formatting even without kerneldocs etc.? Cheers, Lorenzo
