On 9/12/25 6:51 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major
> version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process
> docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually
> incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future), replace
> it with the placeholder.
>
> Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the
> numbering scheme.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/process/2.Process.rst | 40 ++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst b/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
> index ef3b116492df08..668d5559ded039 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
> @@ -13,24 +13,18 @@ how the process works is required in order to be an effective part of it.
> The big picture
> ---------------
>
> -The kernel developers use a loosely time-based release process, with a new
> -major kernel release happening every two or three months. The recent
> -release history looks like this:
> +Linux kernel uses a loosely time-based, rolling release development model.
The Linux kernel
> +A new major kernel release (a.x) [1]_ happens every two or three monts, which
I'm much more used to x.y months,
> +comes with new features, internal API changes, and more. A typical release
> +can contain about 13,000 changesets with changes to several hundred thousand
> +lines of code. Recent releases, along with their dates, can be found at
> +`Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_version_history>`_.
>
> - ====== =================
> - 5.0 March 3, 2019
> - 5.1 May 5, 2019
> - 5.2 July 7, 2019
> - 5.3 September 15, 2019
> - 5.4 November 24, 2019
> - 5.5 January 6, 2020
> - ====== =================
> -
> -Every 5.x release is a major kernel release with new features, internal
> -API changes, and more. A typical release can contain about 13,000
> -changesets with changes to several hundred thousand lines of code. 5.x is
> -the leading edge of Linux kernel development; the kernel uses a
> -rolling development model which is continually integrating major changes.
> +.. [1] Strictly speaking, Linux kernel do not use semantic versioning
the Linux kernel does not
> + number scheme, but rather a.x pair identifies major release
x.y ?
m.n ?
rather the a.x
> + version as a whole number. For each release, x is incremented,
> + but a is incremented only if x is deemed large enough (e.g.
> + Linux 5.0 is released following Linux 4.20).
>
> A relatively straightforward discipline is followed with regard to the
> merging of patches for each release. At the beginning of each development
> @@ -48,9 +42,9 @@ detail later on).
>
> The merge window lasts for approximately two weeks. At the end of this
> time, Linus Torvalds will declare that the window is closed and release the
> -first of the "rc" kernels. For the kernel which is destined to be 5.6,
> +first of the "rc" kernels. For the kernel which is destined to be a.x,
> for example, the release which happens at the end of the merge window will
> -be called 5.6-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to
> +be called a.x-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to
> merge new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next
> kernel has begun.
>
> @@ -99,13 +93,13 @@ release is made. In the real world, this kind of perfection is hard to
> achieve; there are just too many variables in a project of this size.
> There comes a point where delaying the final release just makes the problem
> worse; the pile of changes waiting for the next merge window will grow
> -larger, creating even more regressions the next time around. So most 5.x
> -kernels go out with a handful of known regressions though, hopefully, none
> -of them are serious.
> +larger, creating even more regressions the next time around. So most kernels
> +go out with a handful of known regressions though, hopefully, none of them
I would add another comma: regressions,
> +are serious.
>
> Once a stable release is made, its ongoing maintenance is passed off to the
> "stable team," currently Greg Kroah-Hartman. The stable team will release
and Sasha Levin:
STABLE BRANCH
M: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
M: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> -occasional updates to the stable release using the 5.x.y numbering scheme.
> +occasional updates to the stable release using the a.x.y numbering scheme.
> To be considered for an update release, a patch must (1) fix a significant
> bug, and (2) already be merged into the mainline for the next development
> kernel. Kernels will typically receive stable updates for a little more
>
> base-commit: f44a29784f685804d9970cfb0d3439c9e30981d7
thanks.
--
~Randy
