On 13/08/2025 10:52, Yibo Dong wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 05:14:15PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
On 12/08/2025 10:39, Dong Yibo wrote:
Initialize basic mbx_fw ops, such as get_capability, reset phy
and so on.
Signed-off-by: Dong Yibo <dong100@xxxxxxxxx>
+static int mucse_fw_send_cmd_wait(struct mucse_hw *hw,
+ struct mbx_fw_cmd_req *req,
+ struct mbx_fw_cmd_reply *reply)
+{
+ int len = le16_to_cpu(req->datalen) + MBX_REQ_HDR_LEN;
+ int retry_cnt = 3;
+ int err;
+
+ err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&hw->mbx.lock);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ err = hw->mbx.ops->write_posted(hw, (u32 *)req,
+ L_WD(len));
+ if (err) {> + mutex_unlock(&hw->mbx.lock);
+ return err;
+ }
it might look a bit cleaner if you add error label and have unlock code
once in the end of the function...
If it is more cleaner bellow?
static int mucse_fw_send_cmd_wait(struct mucse_hw *hw,
struct mbx_fw_cmd_req *req,
struct mbx_fw_cmd_reply *reply)
{
int len = le16_to_cpu(req->datalen) + MBX_REQ_HDR_LEN;
int retry_cnt = 3;
int err;
err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&hw->mbx.lock);
if (err)
return err;
err = hw->mbx.ops->write_posted(hw, (u32 *)req,
L_WD(len));
if (err)
goto quit;
do {
err = hw->mbx.ops->read_posted(hw, (u32 *)reply,
L_WD(sizeof(*reply)));
if (err)
goto quit;
} while (--retry_cnt >= 0 && reply->opcode != req->opcode);
mutex_unlock(&hw->mbx.lock);
if (retry_cnt < 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
if (reply->error_code)
return -EIO;
return 0;
quit:
mutex_unlock(&hw->mbx.lock);
return err;
}
Maybe:
} while (--retry_cnt >= 0 && reply->opcode != req->opcode);
quit:
mutex_unlock(&hw->mbx.lock);
if (!err && retry_cnt < 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
if (!err && reply->error_code)
return -EIO;
return err;
looks cleaner