Em Tue, 03 Jun 2025 17:04:06 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> escreveu: > Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > I wonder why they used a border rather than the text-decoration that is > > there for exactly that purpose? I'm inclined to change the CSS to get > > reliable underlining for everybody. > > Having played with this a bit, I'm guessing they went with the border > because the text-decoration underline gets mixed up with underscores in > function names, while the border sits below the underscore. > > Assuming we want to preserve that behavior, tossing in a line like: > > border-bottom-width: 2px; > > makes those underlines (that I never even knew existed :) visible. So > maybe that's the approach to take? What I suspect is that this could be related to your monitor's DPI, and eventually to WM scaling. When you used a larger size, it became visible. I would override CSS and replace a.reference to disable border and enable text decoration, as this is probably more portable. Still, I think it is worth to have separate CSS classes for xref and broken xref, as if one wants to do a different decoration, that would be possible. > > Thanks, > > jon Thanks, Mauro
