Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> writes: > I wonder why they used a border rather than the text-decoration that is > there for exactly that purpose? I'm inclined to change the CSS to get > reliable underlining for everybody. Having played with this a bit, I'm guessing they went with the border because the text-decoration underline gets mixed up with underscores in function names, while the border sits below the underscore. Assuming we want to preserve that behavior, tossing in a line like: border-bottom-width: 2px; makes those underlines (that I never even knew existed :) visible. So maybe that's the approach to take? Thanks, jon
