Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cgroup, docs: be specific about bandwidth control of rt processes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:07:45PM +0900, Shashank Balaji via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Balaji <shashank.mahadasyam@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index 1a16ce68a4d7f6f8c9070be89c4975dbfa79077e..3b3685736fe9b12e96a273248dfb4a8c62a4b698 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ cpufreq governor about the minimum desired frequency which should always be
>  provided by a CPU, as well as the maximum desired frequency, which should not
>  be exceeded by a CPU.
>  
> -WARNING: cgroup2 cpu controller doesn't yet fully support the control of
> +WARNING: cgroup2 cpu controller doesn't yet support the (bandwidth) control of

This reads weird to me. Without the () part, it becomes "doesn't yet support
the control of". Maybe rephrase it a bit more?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux