On 21-04-2025 07:19 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > I didn't realize this was so subtle with the backporting. I don't think > I can take this on, sorry. Any change needed or just because some other maintainer manages this? Although Tbh, I really don't care about backporting since T2 Mac users are still using patched kernels provided by us. I'd rather free my mind in getting this done. > > Le Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 06:40:23PM +0530, Aditya Garg a écrit : >> >> >> On 21-04-2025 06:38 pm, Aditya Garg wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 21-04-2025 06:37 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: >>>>> On 21-04-2025 05:35 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: >>>>>>> Can I have a feedback from some DRM maintainer on this? AFAIK merge window is over for some time now. It's been more than a week and last time when I submitted, it just stayed in the mailing list without any feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> DRM hides the merge window from committers so that's not super relevant. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am a DRM committer and can pick this up if necessary but it's not >>>>>> clear to me what's going thru with DRM vs elsewhere. >>>>> >>>>> All the three patches are intended to go through DRM. IIRC Petr, the vsprintf maintainers had requested for that to be done. >>>>> >>>>> The relevant patches have been Reviewed-by Petr as well. >>>> >>>> OK, will queue this today. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Also, Petr has requested them to be backported for 6.15 >> >> To be more clear, he does not have objection for backporting to 6.15. Although its your call. >>
