Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Use proper printk format in appletbdrm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I didn't realize this was so subtle with the backporting. I don't think
I can take this on, sorry.

Le Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 06:40:23PM +0530, Aditya Garg a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 21-04-2025 06:38 pm, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 21-04-2025 06:37 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> >>> On 21-04-2025 05:35 pm, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> >>>>> Can I have a feedback from some DRM maintainer on this? AFAIK merge window is over for some time now. It's been more than a week and last time when I submitted, it just stayed in the mailing list without any feedback.
> >>>>
> >>>> DRM hides the merge window from committers so that's not super relevant.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am a DRM committer and can pick this up if necessary but it's not
> >>>> clear to me what's going thru with DRM vs elsewhere.
> >>>
> >>> All the three patches are intended to go through DRM. IIRC Petr, the vsprintf maintainers had requested for that to be done.
> >>>
> >>> The relevant patches have been Reviewed-by Petr as well.
> >>
> >> OK, will queue this today.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Also, Petr has requested them to be backported for 6.15
> 
> To be more clear, he does not have objection for backporting to 6.15. Although its your call. 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux