Hi Greg, On 4/11/2025 5:54 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:40:15PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: >>>>> Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next. >>>> >>>> let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes... >>> >>> All looks good, so let me go apply this to my usb-next branch now. >>> >>> Thanks for sticking with this, I think it deserves the "most versions ever" >>> of a patch series award. >>> >> >> I have honestly no intention of blocking this series any longer, but the >> comments I raised on PATCH 26/31 are likely valid and suggest the series >> wasn't fully tested on v38. So I would personally prefer to get fixes >> and confirmation on that from Wesley and then merge v39. It doesn't feel >> like the kind of thing to fix incrementally on top, since the commit >> message is also misleading now. > > I think a fixup is probably sufficient, especially as I can't rebase my > tree, and reverting all of these is just a mess. > Sure I will submit a fix up today. Thanks Greg, Stephan for the feedback and help with the overall progress of the series. Thanks Wesley Cheng
