On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:40:15PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:11:42AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > > > Requesting to see if we can get some Acked-By tags, and merge on usb-next. > > > > > > let me give it some 0-day bot testing to see how that goes... > > > > All looks good, so let me go apply this to my usb-next branch now. > > > > Thanks for sticking with this, I think it deserves the "most versions ever" > > of a patch series award. > > > > I have honestly no intention of blocking this series any longer, but the > comments I raised on PATCH 26/31 are likely valid and suggest the series > wasn't fully tested on v38. So I would personally prefer to get fixes > and confirmation on that from Wesley and then merge v39. It doesn't feel > like the kind of thing to fix incrementally on top, since the commit > message is also misleading now. I think a fixup is probably sufficient, especially as I can't rebase my tree, and reverting all of these is just a mess. thanks, greg k-h
